What’s Happening in Rossport?
New contributor A. L. Waller gives us a detailed roundup of where the parties stand in the Rossport five case.
Art, media, opinion and ideas
New contributor A. L. Waller gives us a detailed roundup of where the parties stand in the Rossport five case.
A message went out this week to members of the Law Library (barristers to the likes of you and I) for them to collect their security cards, as the Courts Service was intending to implement their grand plan of access restriction for the Four Courts buildings. Then the next day another message was passed on from the Courts Service not to come and get the cards after all.
Of great value when having a row with a huge organisation which claims it can do anything it likes because you signed up to an agreement with it. S. I.
Having spoken to the OPW, I've been told that they intend to consider the objections made previously under Part 9 of Statutory Instrument 600/2001. I'll come back and report if I find anything of interest in this legislation.
Marcus Glynn, in the first of a series of articles from around Europe gives us the backpacker's view of Amsterdam. We'll have more from him in the weeks to come, as internet cafes allow.
Further to my post and letter of 3rd July I have now delivered a follow up letter, requesting further information from Minister Dempsey, also under Council Directive 2003/4/EC. The full text of this second letter is available on Tuppenceworth. ie.
As I waited for a bus on Amiens St this evening, I heard sirens and, a few seconds later, saw police motorcycle outriders flank a green Army Bomb Disposal Unit trunk on it's way south. My first thought was "probably just a false alarm, people are a bit jumpy after London".
The Web is slowing down. I've only seen it do this a few times. And the most exteme time was as everyone tried to get news of what was happening in New York.
Attending to Mr Michael Daly of the Department of Communications Marine and Natural Resources when he telephoned in response to my letter of 3rd July 2005. 1. He asked me to identify the person for whom I was acting.
I received a registered letter yesterday from the OPW dated 24 June 2005 as follows. Ref: A473/66/6Re: Four Courts:- Objection to Part 9 Planning ConsultationDear Mr McGarrI acknowledge receipt of your letter with regard to the above and I herewith return your payment of twenty euro as there is no obligatory charge in such instances.
Recent Comments